People v. King

174 N.Y.S.3d 879, 2022 NY Slip Op 05711
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 A.D.3d 909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 2022·No. Ind. No. 159/16·Published

Opinion

People v King (2022 NY Slip Op 05711)
People v King
2022 NY Slip Op 05711
Decided on October 12, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 12, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2019-02548
(Ind. No. 159/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Eugene King, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and George D. Adames of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (William E. Garnett, J.), imposed April 24, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).

DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, FORD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 174 N.Y.S.3d 879, 2022 NY Slip Op 05711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

174 N.Y.S.3d 879 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)