People v. King

2017 NY Slip Op 7829, 155 A.D.3d 1574, 63 N.Y.S.3d 286
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2017·No. 1183 KA 13-00883·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John L. DeMarco, J.), rendered March 20, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [4]). Defendant’s challenge to County Court’s order compelling him to provide a buccal swab for DNA analysis is forfeited by his guilty plea (see People v Smith, 138 AD3d 1415, 1416 [4th Dept 2016]; see generally People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227, 230-232 [2000]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, we conclude that the negotiated sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Curran, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 2017 NY Slip Op 7829, 155 A.D.3d 1574, 63 N.Y.S.3d 286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 7829 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jones
2020 NY Slip Op 06661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Graham
2019 NY Slip Op 6925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)