People v. King
267 A.D.2d 1040, 700 N.Y.S.2d 896
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1999·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that the plea allocution is insufficient is not preserved for our review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665) and, in any event, is lacking in merit (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Marks, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. King, 267 A.D.2d 1040, 700 N.Y.S.2d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
267 A.D.2d 1040 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gaines
278 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)