People v. King

255 A.D.2d 338, 679 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11535
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 A.D.2d 391

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), rendered May 9, 1996, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s [339]*339assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 255 A.D.2d 338, 679 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 338 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)