People v. King

207 A.D.2d 911, 616 N.Y.S.2d 992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 A.D.2d 782

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered February 24, 1993, convicting her of reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, Penal Law § 120.25). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s contention that her sentence is excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 207 A.D.2d 911, 616 N.Y.S.2d 992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 911 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)