People v. King

New York Court of Appeals

People v. King

311 N.E.2d 653, 34 N.Y.2d 665, 355 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1669

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 N.Y.2d 917 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 1974·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding [666]*666thereto the following: On the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Did the. court’s selection of the jury, under the procedure mandated by the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, deprive appellant of a fair trial in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States? [33 N Y 2d 917.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding [666]*666thereto the following: On the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Did the. court’s selection of the jury, under the procedure mandated by the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, deprive appellant of a fair trial in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States? [33 N Y 2d 917.]

People v. King, 311 N.E.2d 653, 34 N.Y.2d 665, 355 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1669 (N.Y. 1974).

Pincite

311 N.E.2d 653 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.