People v. King

New York Court of Appeals

People v. King

311 N.E.2d 653, 34 N.Y.2d 665, 355 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1669

DecidedMarch 29, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 311 N.E.2d 653 (People v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. King, 311 N.E.2d 653, 34 N.Y.2d 665, 355 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1669 (N.Y. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding [666]*666thereto the following: On the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Did the. court’s selection of the jury, under the procedure mandated by the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, deprive appellant of a fair trial in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States? [33 N Y 2d 917.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding [666]*666thereto the following: On the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Did the. court’s selection of the jury, under the procedure mandated by the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, deprive appellant of a fair trial in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States? [33 N Y 2d 917.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 N.E.2d 653, 34 N.Y.2d 665, 355 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-king-ny-1974.