People v. King
194 N.W.2d 454, 37 Mich. App. 294
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Mich. App. 619 →
Opinion
Defendant raises two issues for appellate review: (1) alleged improper cross-examination of a res gestae witness by the prosecutor, and (2) alleged improper cross-examination of defendant by the prosecutor. Neither of these alleged errors was preserved by objection at trial. We have, nevertheless, considered them and concluded that the defendant is not entitled to a new trial.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. King, 194 N.W.2d 454, 37 Mich. App. 294 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
194 N.W.2d 454 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.