People v. Kinard
194 N.W.2d 31, 36 Mich. App. 712
This text of 194 N.W.2d 31 (People v. Kinard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Kinard, 194 N.W.2d 31, 36 Mich. App. 712 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
Opinion
Memorandum: Opinion. Defendant-appellant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery contrary to MOLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797). This appeal of right followed, with the people moving to affirm.
Upon a reading of the briefs and record it is manifest that the questions presented are so unsubstantial as to warrant no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 N.W.2d 31, 36 Mich. App. 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kinard-michctapp-1971.