People v. Kin Wong
This text of 81 A.D.3d 421 (People v. Kin Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered August 15, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant did not request a charge on the defense of justification, and the court was under no obligation to deliver one sua sponte. It was clear that defense counsel was pursuing a theory that the complainant was stabbed with his own knife during a struggle over the knife, as opposed to a theory that defendant stabbed the complainant in self-defense. Regardless of whether the evidence might have supported multiple defenses, an unrequested justification charge would have improperly interfered with defendant’s strategy (see People v Johnson, 75 AD3d 426 [2010]).
Defendant’s claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to request a justification charge is [422]*422unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters outside the record concerning counsel’s strategic choices (see People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; People v Love, 57 NY2d 998 [1982]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 A.D.3d 421, 916 N.Y.S.2d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kin-wong-nyappdiv-2011.