People v. Kimmons
This text of 227 A.D.2d 984 (People v. Kimmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his due process and equal protection rights were violated by the nearly eight-year delay between the filing of his notice of appeal and the perfection of the appeal. The delay in the perfection of the appeal is in large part attributable to defendant’s failure to proceed pro se or to request assigned counsel (see, People v Gonzalez, 184 AD2d 525, 526, lv denied 80 NY2d 904; cf., Simmons v Reynolds, 898 F2d 865). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 4th Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 A.D.2d 984, 643 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kimmons-nyappdiv-1996.