People v. Kilpatrick

2017 NY Slip Op 2445, 148 A.D.3d 1183, 49 N.Y.S.3d 309
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2017·No. 2016-03162·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), imposed November 6, 2015, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]).

Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kilpatrick, 2017 NY Slip Op 2445, 148 A.D.3d 1183, 49 N.Y.S.3d 309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2445 (People v. Kilpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dietz
2017 NY Slip Op 5749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)