Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Kilpatrick

People v. Kilpatrick

2017 NY Slip Op 2445, 148 A.D.3d 1183, 49 N.Y.S.3d 309
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 29, 2017
Docket2016-03162
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2445 (People v. Kilpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kilpatrick, 2017 NY Slip Op 2445, 148 A.D.3d 1183, 49 N.Y.S.3d 309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), imposed November 6, 2015, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]).

Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dietz
2017 NY Slip Op 5749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2445, 148 A.D.3d 1183, 49 N.Y.S.3d 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kilpatrick-nyappdiv-2017.