People v. Kilpatrick

118 A.D.2d 732, 500 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54595
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kilpatrick. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 A.D.2d 1

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eiber, J., at trial; Rotker, J., at sentencing), rendered June 28, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant alleges that at several points during the trial the testimony of the complaining witness was improperly bolstered in violation of the rule in People v Trowbridge (305 NY 471), and that this denied him a fair trial. These errors, however, were either corrected by curative instructions (see, People v Sorgente, 90 AD2d 559; People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865), unpreserved for our review (People v West, 56 NY2d 662; CPL 470.05 [2]), or harmless (see, People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kilpatrick, 118 A.D.2d 732, 500 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

118 A.D.2d 732 (People v. Kilpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
443 N.E.2d 478 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Trowbridge
113 N.E.2d 841 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
People v. Santiago
418 N.E.2d 668 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. West
436 N.E.2d 1313 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Sorgente
90 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)