People v. Kidd

49 A.D.3d 558, 855 N.Y.2d 167

Opinion

The defendant argues that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because his attorney failed to join in his pro se motion to vacate his plea of guilty. However, “[a]n attorney assigned to represent a defendant in a criminal case has no duty to participate in a baseless pro se motion to withdraw a plea of guilty which was voluntarily, knowingly, and [559] intelligently made” (People v Ford, 44 AD3d 1070, 1071 [2007]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, defense counsel did not impliedly become a witness against him or take a position adverse to his at the sentencing. Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kidd, 49 A.D.3d 558, 855 N.Y.2d 167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 558 (People v. Kidd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
44 A.D.3d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)