People v. Kidd
This text of 49 A.D.3d 558 (People v. Kidd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant argues that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because his attorney failed to join in his pro se motion to vacate his plea of guilty. However, “[a]n attorney assigned to represent a defendant in a criminal case has no duty to participate in a baseless pro se motion to withdraw a plea of guilty which was voluntarily, knowingly, and [559]*559intelligently made” (People v Ford, 44 AD3d 1070, 1071 [2007]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, defense counsel did not impliedly become a witness against him or take a position adverse to his at the sentencing. Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Garni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.3d 558, 855 N.Y.2d 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kidd-nyappdiv-2008.