People v. Khosla
120 A.D.3d 712, 990 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2014 NY Slip Op 05897, 2014 WL 4085862, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5837
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 20, 2014·No. 2009-06299·Published
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed May 4, 2009, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, *713 90 AD2d 80 [1982]; see also People v Haimson, 164 AD2d 867 [1990]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Khosla, 120 A.D.3d 712, 990 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2014 NY Slip Op 05897, 2014 WL 4085862, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
120 A.D.3d 712 (People v. Khosla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Haimson
164 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)