People v. Khattak (Rehmat)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 2018
Docket2018 NYSlipOp 51667(U)
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Khattak (Rehmat) (People v. Khattak (Rehmat)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Khattak (Rehmat), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Rehmat Khattak, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Ann E. Scherzer, J.), rendered December 21, 2016, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of attempted forcible touching and sexual abuse in the third degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Ann E. Scherzer, J.) rendered December 21, 2016, affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), which included the testimony of the victim and two plainclothes police officers who witnessed the underlying subway incident. There is no basis for disturbing the trial court's determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of the victim's testimony and minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the officers.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: November 26, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Khattak (Rehmat), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-khattak-rehmat-nyappterm-2018.