People v. Khapesi

138 A.D.3d 622, 28 N.Y.S.3d 875
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 2016·No. 4777/10 945 1342/13 944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered November 26, 2013, as amended February 5, 2014, convicting defendant, upon pleas of guilty, of attempted assault in the first degree and violation of probation, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of seven years on the attempted assault conviction, and to a concurrent term of one year for the probation violation, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was not entitled to a youthful offender determination in connection with the violation of probation proceeding. At the time of his 2011 attempted robbery conviction, defendant was not considered for YO treatment, was sentenced to probation without such treatment, and did not appeal. Since “to revoke a penalty of probation does not equate to annulling a sentence” (People v Thompson, 26 NY3d 678, 687 [2016]), there is no reason to apply the principles of People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]) to defendant’s situation. The 2011 judgment was final, and the violation of probation only resulted in a replacement of the original conditional penalty with a different punishment.

Concur — Acosta, J.R, Renwick, ManzanetDaniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Khapesi, 138 A.D.3d 622, 28 N.Y.S.3d 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 622 (People v. Khapesi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Montague
2019 NY Slip Op 2750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)