People v. Keys

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Keys

136 A.D.3d 523, 24 N.Y.S.3d 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 2016

Docket235 1798/13

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 523 (People v. Keys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Keys, 136 A.D.3d 523, 24 N.Y.S.3d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered April 22, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of attempted assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion. Even considering the period following the court’s decision on the motion, about which defendant has not preserved any claim, we find, upon consideration of the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442 [1975]), that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial. In particular, most of the delay is attributable to defendant and his counsel.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered April 22, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of attempted assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion. Even considering the period following the court’s decision on the motion, about which defendant has not preserved any claim, we find, upon consideration of the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442 [1975]), that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial. In particular, most of the delay is attributable to defendant and his counsel.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.3d 523, 24 N.Y.S.3d 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-keys-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack