People v. Kevrekian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kevrekian

304 A.D.2d 374, 756 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 304 A.D.2d 374 (People v. Kevrekian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kevrekian, 304 A.D.2d 374, 756 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.), rendered December 20, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and two counts of possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, 1 year and 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of the evidence warranted the inference of larcenous intent (see People v Kirnon, 39 AD2d 666, 667 [1972], affd 31 NY2d 877 [1972]), and the jury properly discredited defendant’s testimony that he only intended to borrow the car. We note that defendant was arrested in possession of the car at a location that was inconsistent with his claimed destination. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.), rendered December 20, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and two counts of possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, 1 year and 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of the evidence warranted the inference of larcenous intent (see People v Kirnon, 39 AD2d 666, 667 [1972], affd 31 NY2d 877 [1972]), and the jury properly discredited defendant’s testimony that he only intended to borrow the car. We note that defendant was arrested in possession of the car at a location that was inconsistent with his claimed destination. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 374, 756 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kevrekian-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack