People v. Kessler

31 A.D.3d 786, 818 N.Y.S.2d 485
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the [787] defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered May 13, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. The defendant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel in connection with this appeal cannot be addressed on this appeal (see People v Bachert, 69 NY2d 593 [1987]). Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kessler, 31 A.D.3d 786, 818 N.Y.S.2d 485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

31 A.D.3d 786 (People v. Kessler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Merriman
2017 NY Slip Op 3196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Seaton
45 A.D.3d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)