People v. Kerrick

52 Cal. 446
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1877·No. No. 10,284·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

■ By the Court :

In the charge to the jury the Court instructed them that “ all that is necessary in order to justify the jury in finding the defendant guilty is, that they shall be satisfied from the evidence of the defendant’s guilt to a moral certainty, and beyond a reasonable doubt, although they may not be entirely satisfied from the evidence that the defendant and no other person committed the alleged offense.” This instruction is almost identical with those which were held to be erroneous in People v. Phipps, 39 Cal. 326, and in People v. Padilla, 42 Cal. 535, and on the authority of these cases the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kerrick, 52 Cal. 446 (Cal. 1877).

52 Cal. 446 (People v. Kerrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kaiser
51 P. 702 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
State v. Ryan
30 P. 78 (Montana Supreme Court, 1892)
People v. Carrillo
11 P. 840 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
People v. Cheong Foon Ark
61 Cal. 527 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
People v. Brown
56 Cal. 405 (California Supreme Court, 1880)