People v. Kenyon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kenyon

188 A.D.2d 905, 591 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14639

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 A.D.2d 905 (People v. Kenyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kenyon, 188 A.D.2d 905, 591 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the [906]*906County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered December 10, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Defendant contends that his sentence of 7 to 21 years’ imprisonment was harsh and excessive. Defendant’s plea of guilty to the crime of manslaughter in the first degree was in full satisfaction of a two-count indictment that had included the more serious charge of murder in the second degree. Defendant’s sentence was consistent with the plea bargain and was less than the harshest possible sentence. We therefore find no basis upon which to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see, People v Mackey, 136 AD2d 780, lv denied 71 NY2d 899; People v Du Bray, 76 AD2d 976).

Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the [906]*906County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered December 10, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Defendant contends that his sentence of 7 to 21 years’ imprisonment was harsh and excessive. Defendant’s plea of guilty to the crime of manslaughter in the first degree was in full satisfaction of a two-count indictment that had included the more serious charge of murder in the second degree. Defendant’s sentence was consistent with the plea bargain and was less than the harshest possible sentence. We therefore find no basis upon which to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see, People v Mackey, 136 AD2d 780, lv denied 71 NY2d 899; People v Du Bray, 76 AD2d 976).

Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 905, 591 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kenyon-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack