People v. Kent

71 A.D.3d 1162, 896 N.Y.S.2d 913
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kent. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 A.D.3d 52

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Me[1163]*1163Carmack, J.), rendered May 29, 2009, convicting him of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1234 (a), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Finger, 95 NY2d 894, 895 [2000]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19-21 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Romain, 38 AD3d 573 [2007]; People v Remy, 19 AD3d 515 [2005]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or do not require reversal. Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kent, 71 A.D.3d 1162, 896 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

71 A.D.3d 1162 (People v. Kent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Finger
739 N.E.2d 290 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Remy
19 A.D.3d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Romain
38 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)