People v. Kenrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kenrick

97 A.D.3d 604, 947 N.Y.2d 344

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.3d 604 (People v. Kenrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kenrick, 97 A.D.3d 604, 947 N.Y.2d 344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant contends that he was deprived of his statutory right to exercise peremptory challenges because the trial court seated a prospective juror whom his counsel had sought to exclude. The defendant’s argument was waived when, before the jury was sworn, the defendant conceded, without reservation or qualification, that he considered the jury panel to be satisfactory (see People v Phillip, 215 AD2d 598 [1995]; see also People v Mattina, 287 AD2d 468 [2001]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant contends that he was deprived of his statutory right to exercise peremptory challenges because the trial court seated a prospective juror whom his counsel had sought to exclude. The defendant’s argument was waived when, before the jury was sworn, the defendant conceded, without reservation or qualification, that he considered the jury panel to be satisfactory (see People v Phillip, 215 AD2d 598 [1995]; see also People v Mattina, 287 AD2d 468 [2001]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.3d 604, 947 N.Y.2d 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kenrick-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack