People v. Kennerly

269 A.D.2d 543, 704 N.Y.S.2d 489, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1933

This text of 269 A.D.2d 543 (People v. Kennerly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kennerly, 269 A.D.2d 543, 704 N.Y.S.2d 489, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 21, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and jostling, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling was a provident exercise of discretion. The court balanced the relevant factors and formulated an appropriate compromise (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d [544]*544371). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 543, 704 N.Y.S.2d 489, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kennerly-nyappdiv-2000.