People v. Kenard J.

289 A.D.2d 990, 734 N.Y.S.2d 918

This text of 289 A.D.2d 990 (People v. Kenard J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kenard J., 289 A.D.2d 990, 734 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Adjudication unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. “In a bench trial, as in a jury trial, the credibility determinations made by the trier of fact are entitled to great deference” (People v Robinson, 272 AD2d 943, lv denied 95 NY2d 870). Upon our review of the conflicting evidence, we cannot conclude that “the trier of fact has failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Adjudication of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — Youthful Offender.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Robinson
272 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 A.D.2d 990, 734 N.Y.S.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kenard-j-nyappdiv-2001.