People v. Kemplin
This text of 192 N.W.2d 333 (People v. Kemplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion. Defendants were convicted by a jury of the crime of breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny,
[417]*417A review of the briefs and records in this cause make it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.
MCLA § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.305).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 N.W.2d 333, 35 Mich. App. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kemplin-michctapp-1971.