People v. Kemp

255 A.D.2d 240, 683 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12680
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered June 13, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s general appeal waiver, which was part of the negotiated plea, encompasses his present challenge to the suppression ruling (People v Jandrew, 101 AD2d 90; see also, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733; People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 574-575), and thus forecloses review of that ruling. We decline to follow the Second Department’s decision in People v Bray (154 AD2d 692, lv denied 75 NY2d 767). We note, in any event, that the subject appeal waiver must necessarily have been intended to encompass the suppression ruling, since that was the only issue of any substance that would have survived the guilty plea itself. Concur: — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kemp, 255 A.D.2d 240, 683 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 240 (People v. Kemp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
257 A.D.2d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)