People v. Kelly

2019 NY Slip Op 1654
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 7, 2019
Docket4411/02 8627 8626
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1654 (People v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kelly, 2019 NY Slip Op 1654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Kelly (2019 NY Slip Op 01654)
People v Kelly
2019 NY Slip Op 01654
Decided on March 7, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 7, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Tom, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

4411/02 8627 8626

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Benjamin Kelly, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (M. Callagee O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about September 12, 2017, which denied defendant's Correction Law § 168-o(2) petition to modify his sex offender classification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying a modification of defendant's level two classification. Although defendant contends he has lived a law-abiding life for an extended period since his release, he had been free of parole supervision for only four years at the time of the petition. Defendant inadequately substantiated the other mitigating factors he cited. In any event, even if the mitigating factors were

established, they are outweighed by the seriousness of the sex crime, which was committed against a child over an extended period (see e.g. People v Lopez, 154 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 7, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
2017 NY Slip Op 7229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2019.