People v. Kelly
Opinion
| People v Kelly |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 01654 |
| Decided on March 7, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 7, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Tom, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.
4411/02 8627 8626
v
Benjamin Kelly, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (M. Callagee O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about September 12, 2017, which denied defendant's Correction Law § 168-o(2) petition to modify his sex offender classification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion in denying a modification of defendant's level two classification. Although defendant contends he has lived a law-abiding life for an extended period since his release, he had been free of parole supervision for only four years at the time of the petition. Defendant inadequately substantiated the other mitigating factors he cited. In any event, even if the mitigating factors were
established, they are outweighed by the seriousness of the sex crime, which was committed against a child over an extended period (see e.g. People v Lopez, 154 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2017]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 7, 2019
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2019 NY Slip Op 1654 (People v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.