People v. Kelly

132 A.D.3d 437, 17 N.Y.S.3d 403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 A.D.3d 713
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 8, 2015·No. 15811 2822/12·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. New *438 man, J.), rendered on February 14, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The totality of circumstances supports the court’s finding of abandonment (see People v Murray, 256 AD2d 116 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 1052 [1999]). The police had information that a man meeting defendant’s description had a firearm in a black bag. As the police arrived at the scene, defendant looked at the uniformed officers, turned and walked into a store, where he immediately placed the black bag he was carrying on a countertop and then turned and walked away from it toward the store’s exit, leaving his bag visible and unattended in a publicly accessible area. These circumstances supported the inference that defendant intended to divest himself of the bag in order to avoid being caught in possession of the pistol contained in the bag and ultimately found by the police. Accordingly, defendant gave up his expectation of privacy in the bag.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kelly, 132 A.D.3d 437, 17 N.Y.S.3d 403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

132 A.D.3d 437 (People v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Murray
256 A.D.2d 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)