People v. Kelly

131 A.D.3d 1181, 16 N.Y.S.3d 749
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 A.D.3d 713
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2015·No. 2014-01112·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter J.), imposed July 23, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]; cf. People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kelly, 131 A.D.3d 1181, 16 N.Y.S.3d 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

131 A.D.3d 1181 (People v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)