People v. Kelly

278 A.D.2d 432, 718 N.Y.S.2d 607, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13241
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 270 A.D.2d 511

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 27, 1998, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), sodomy in the first degree (three counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (six counts), and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Plorio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kelly, 278 A.D.2d 432, 718 N.Y.S.2d 607, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 432 (People v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)