People v. Kelly

100 A.D.2d 884, 473 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18004

This text of 100 A.D.2d 884 (People v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kelly, 100 A.D.2d 884, 473 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered April 25,1983, convicting him of a violation of probation, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. H Amended judgment affirmed. S We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.2d 884, 473 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1984.