People v. Kelly

108 N.E.2d 619, 304 N.Y. 760, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 962
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 302 N.Y. 512
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 1952·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. All concur, except Conway, J., not sitting, and Fuld, J., who dissents in the following memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, the trial court should have held a hearing, when defendant moved for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence (Code Crim. Pro., § 465, subd. 7), to determine whether the state-employed psychiatrist would have testified — as defense counsel asserted in his affidavit in support of the motion — that it was his opinion that defendant was insane at the time of the homicide. Accordingly, I dissent and vote to withhold decision upon the present motion for reargument pending a hearing by the trial court in connection with the defendant’s application for a new trial. [See 304 N. Y. 662, 798.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kelly, 108 N.E.2d 619, 304 N.Y. 760, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 962 (N.Y. 1952).

108 N.E.2d 619 (People v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kelly
107 N.E.2d 589 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)