People v. Kelley

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Kelley

162 N.W.2d 148, 11 Mich. App. 706, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1368

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 24, 1968

DocketDocket No. 4,306

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 N.W.2d 148 (People v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kelley, 162 N.W.2d 148, 11 Mich. App. 706, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1368 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of willfully obstructing and resisting peace officers attempting to serve a warrant and to preserve and maintain the peace. CL 1948, § 750.479 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.747). Defendant appeals claiming [707]*707the trial court erred by allowing a potential juror having a social relationship with one of the witnesses to remain on the jury. In reviewing the record it reveals that defense counsel was aware of the relationship and when asked if he was satisfied with the jury for cause replied “Yes, sir.” Defendant’s failure to object at the voir dire examination indicating his satisfaction of the jury, forecloses his objection on appeal.

Affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of willfully obstructing and resisting peace officers attempting to serve a warrant and to preserve and maintain the peace. CL 1948, § 750.479 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.747). Defendant appeals claiming [707]*707the trial court erred by allowing a potential juror having a social relationship with one of the witnesses to remain on the jury. In reviewing the record it reveals that defense counsel was aware of the relationship and when asked if he was satisfied with the jury for cause replied “Yes, sir.” Defendant’s failure to object at the voir dire examination indicating his satisfaction of the jury, forecloses his objection on appeal.

Affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.W.2d 148, 11 Mich. App. 706, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kelley-michctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack