People v. Keller

198 A.D.2d 911, 604 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11604
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record shows that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). In any event, the unsupported assertions of defendant that he lacked the mental competence to plead guilty to the predicate felony conviction or that the court failed to explain the seriousness of that conviction or its consequences were insufficient to sustain defendant’s burden of proving that the predicate felony conviction was constitutionally infirm (see, People v Anderson, 100 AD2d 937). Also, imposition of the bargained-for minimum indeterminate term [912]*912of imprisonment mandated by statute (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [e]; [4]) is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Attempted Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Keller, 198 A.D.2d 911, 604 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 911 (People v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gutierrez
2003 UT App 95 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2003)