People v. Keitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Keitt

1 A.D.2d 458, 767 N.Y.S.2d 778

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 458 (People v. Keitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Keitt, 1 A.D.2d 458, 767 N.Y.S.2d 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J), rendered May 28, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Demakos, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain physical evidence (see People v Ocasio, 85 NY2d 982 [1995]; People v Bora, 83 NY2d 531 [1994]; People v Reyes, 83 NY2d 945 [1994], cert denied 513 US 991 [1994]). Ritter, J.R, Goldstein, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J), rendered May 28, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Demakos, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain physical evidence (see People v Ocasio, 85 NY2d 982 [1995]; People v Bora, 83 NY2d 531 [1994]; People v Reyes, 83 NY2d 945 [1994], cert denied 513 US 991 [1994]). Ritter, J.R, Goldstein, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 458, 767 N.Y.S.2d 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-keitt-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack