People v. Keitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Keitt

217 A.D.2d 668, 630 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 668 (People v. Keitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Keitt, 217 A.D.2d 668, 630 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered May 9, 1994, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the third degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered May 9, 1994, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the third degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 668, 630 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-keitt-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack