People v. Keita

246 A.D.2d 338, 666 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 39
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J., on first speedy trial motion; Harold Beeler, J., on second speedy trial motion, plea and sentence), rendered October 14, 1994, convicting defendant of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

Analysis of all five of the Taranovich factors leads us to conclude that defendant was not denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.20; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). We specifically note that almost all of the delay resulted either from defendant’s absconding or from motion practice, and that defendant’s claims of prejudice are conclusory and un[339] supported by the record. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Keita, 246 A.D.2d 338, 666 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 39 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 338 (People v. Keita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Woodruff
9 A.D.3d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)