People v. Keeton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Keeton

256 A.D.2d 1132, 684 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 1132 (People v. Keeton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Keeton, 256 A.D.2d 1132, 684 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that Supreme Court should have suppressed a statement that he made to a police investigator following his arrest. Although the statement was made while defendant was in custody at the Public Safety Building, the [1133]*1133evidence adduced at the Huntley hearing supports the court’s conclusion that the statement was not the result of police interrogation or its functional equivalent (see, People v Huffman, 61 NY2d 795; People v Reinard, 244 AD2d 936, lv denied 91 NY2d 896). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Hayes, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that Supreme Court should have suppressed a statement that he made to a police investigator following his arrest. Although the statement was made while defendant was in custody at the Public Safety Building, the [1133]*1133evidence adduced at the Huntley hearing supports the court’s conclusion that the statement was not the result of police interrogation or its functional equivalent (see, People v Huffman, 61 NY2d 795; People v Reinard, 244 AD2d 936, lv denied 91 NY2d 896). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Hayes, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 1132, 684 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-keeton-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack