Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Keeton

People v. Keeton

203 A.D.2d 899, 612 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4875
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 899 (People v. Keeton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Keeton, 203 A.D.2d 899, 612 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s absence from the side-bar questioning of one prospective juror does not require reversal because, immediately after the side-bar conference, the prospective juror was excused by consent of both parties (see, People v Castro-Garcia, 203 AD2d 899 [decided herewith]; People v Arnold, 201 AD2d 965; People v Johnson, 201 AD2d 965). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Castro-Garcia
203 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 899, 612 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-keeton-nyappdiv-1994.