People v. Keeton
203 A.D.2d 899, 612 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4875
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s absence from the side-bar questioning of one prospective juror does not require reversal because, immediately after the side-bar conference, the prospective juror was excused by consent of both parties (see, People v Castro-Garcia, 203 AD2d 899 [decided herewith]; People v Arnold, 201 AD2d 965; People v Johnson, 201 AD2d 965). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Keeton, 203 A.D.2d 899, 612 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
203 A.D.2d 899 (People v. Keeton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Castro-Garcia
203 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)