People v. Keener

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Keener

203 A.D.2d 816, 612 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4480

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 816 (People v. Keener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Keener, 203 A.D.2d 816, 612 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered November 20, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree.

Upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree and rape in the first degree, defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 8 to 24 years. Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence imposed, which was less than the harshest possible. Upon review of the record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered November 20, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree.

Upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree and rape in the first degree, defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 8 to 24 years. Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence imposed, which was less than the harshest possible. Upon review of the record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 816, 612 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-keener-nyappdiv-1994.