People v. Keel

201 A.D.2d 960, 607 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2153
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 960 (People v. Keel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Keel, 201 A.D.2d 960, 607 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in refusing to permit defendant to use records of the victim’s participation in a drug rehabilitation program to cross-examine the victim. The scope of cross-examination is generally subject to the sound discretion of the Trial Judge (People v Ocasio, 47 NY2d 55, 60). The victim admitted on cross-examination that she had used cocaine prior to the attack, that she smoked marihuana on the night of the attack and that she used public assistance money to buy drugs. Under those circumstances we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Yelder
227 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Whitney
211 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 960, 607 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-keel-nyappdiv-1994.