People v. Keating

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Keating

21 A.D.3d 970, 800 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9094

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 12, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001 (People v Keating, 283 AD2d 589 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered December 13, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001 (People v Keating, 283 AD2d 589 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered December 13, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.

People v. Keating, 21 A.D.3d 970, 800 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

21 A.D.3d 970 (People v. Keating) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related