People v. Keating

159 A.D.2d 977, 555 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3279
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of robbery in the first degree and argues that the court committed reversible error by denying defense counsel’s motion to preclude the prosecutor from cross-examining defendant about pending charges. Defense counsel asserts the privilege against self-incrimination for the first time on appeal and thus has failed to preserve this issue for our review (see, People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292, n 3; cf, People v Betts, 70 NY2d 289), and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice.

[978]*978We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them lacking merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J. — robbery, first degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Keating, 159 A.D.2d 977, 555 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

159 A.D.2d 977 (People v. Keating) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brito
179 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. McFadden
178 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)