People v. Kearse

211 A.D.2d 503, 621 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 347
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kearse. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 104

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J., at suppression hearing; Antonio Brandveen, J., at plea and sentence) rendered October 8, 1992, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree and sentencing him to a term of 2Vz to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The testimony at the suppression hearing clearly established that the arresting officers had probable cause to effect an arrest of the defendant following their conversation with a sergeant at the scene of the crime. The information supplied to the arresting officers by the sergeant satisfied the requirements of the Aguilar-Spinelli test, rendering the sergeant’s testimony at the hearing unnecessary (People v Parris, 83 NY2d 342). The present argument was not made before the [504]*504hearing court, defendant having asked only for the opportunity to cross-examine the sergeant. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kearse, 211 A.D.2d 503, 621 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 503 (People v. Kearse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Parris
632 N.E.2d 870 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)