People v. Kay
This text of 16 A.D.2d 786 (People v. Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assignment of M. Arthur Hammer, Esq., as counsel for the defendant-appellant, contained in the order of this court entered on May 24, 1962, vacated, and Howard Goldfluss, Esq., of 401 Broadway, New York, N. Y. is assigned as counsel for defendant-appellant in the place and stead of M. Arthur Hammer, Esq. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 786, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kay-nyappdiv-1962.