People v. Kauffman
This text of 239 A.D. 876 (People v. Kauffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the court should have received proof of the circumstances under which the defendant’s testimony before the grand jury was given, including the so-called agreement with the district attorney (People v. Kurtz, 42 Hun, 335, 3,44; State v. Berberick, 38 Mont. 423; Kirk v. Territory, 10 Okla. 46; Young v. State, 68 Ala. 569; State v. Barker, 56 Wash. 510; People v. Joyce, 233 N. Y. 61), we think the error in view of the entire record could not have affected the result and may, therefore, be disregarded. All concur. Judgment of conviction affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kauffman-nyappdiv-1933.