People v. Katz

214 A.D.2d 586, 625 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered November 26, 1991, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County for a new persistent violent felony offender hearing.

While the trial court’s charge concerning the defendant’s status as an interested witness was improper, it nevertheless constitutes harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (cf., People v Williams, 197 AD2d 721; People v Martinez, 186 AD2d 153).

In view of the defendant’s indication that he was challenging his 1986 felony conviction on constitutional grounds, the court was obligated to conduct further inquiry to ascertain the nature of defendant’s constitutional challenges, and to conduct a hearing thereon (see, CPL 400.16; People v Chestnut, 188 AD2d 480; People v Davis, 144 AD2d 688).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either not preserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Katz, 214 A.D.2d 586, 625 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

214 A.D.2d 586 (People v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Conklin
2017 NY Slip Op 8534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Rivers
81 A.D.3d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Pierre
30 A.D.3d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)