People v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Katz

55 A.D.2d 658, 390 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 658 (People v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Katz, 55 A.D.2d 658, 390 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by defendants from two judgments (one as to each of them) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 7, 1975, convicting each of them of unlawful possession, etc., of untaxed cigarettes, as a felony, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. There was probable cause, on the basis of the personal observations of two investigators, for the issuance of a search warrant. Defendants’ applications to withdraw their pleas of guilty were properly denied since the Criminal Term did not violate its promise as to sentence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum: Although the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant was insufficient to justify the issuance of said warrant, I nevertheless vote to affirm on the constraint of People v Giammarino (53 AD2d 871).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by defendants from two judgments (one as to each of them) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 7, 1975, convicting each of them of unlawful possession, etc., of untaxed cigarettes, as a felony, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. There was probable cause, on the basis of the personal observations of two investigators, for the issuance of a search warrant. Defendants’ applications to withdraw their pleas of guilty were properly denied since the Criminal Term did not violate its promise as to sentence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum: Although the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant was insufficient to justify the issuance of said warrant, I nevertheless vote to affirm on the constraint of People v Giammarino (53 AD2d 871).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 658, 390 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-katz-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack