People v. Kartee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kartee

119 A.D.2d 589, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55523

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Kartee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kartee, 119 A.D.2d 589, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered August 30, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his guilty plea was not voluntarily and knowingly entered is not supported by the record. The totality of the circumstances indicate his plea was not coerced. Moreover, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to deny his motion to withdraw his plea, without a hearing, after it had reviewed the papers submitted in support of that motion (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520).

[590]*590Furthermore, the defendant’s contention that his sentence should be reduced is also without merit. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered August 30, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his guilty plea was not voluntarily and knowingly entered is not supported by the record. The totality of the circumstances indicate his plea was not coerced. Moreover, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to deny his motion to withdraw his plea, without a hearing, after it had reviewed the papers submitted in support of that motion (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520).

[590]*590Furthermore, the defendant’s contention that his sentence should be reduced is also without merit. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 589, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kartee-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack